4.7 Article

Seasonal shift in airborne microbial communities

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 716, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137129

关键词

Atmospheric microorganisms; Bioaerosols; Planetary boundary layer; Amplicon sequencing; Biosphere-atmosphere interactions

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-15-CE01-0002-INHALE]
  2. Region Auvergne-Rhone Alpes
  3. CAMPUS France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microorganisms are ubiquitous in the atmosphere. Global investigations on the geographical and temporal distribution of airborne microbial communities are critical for identifying the sources and the factors shaping airborne communities. At mid-latitude sites, a seasonal shift in both the concentration and diversity of airborne microbial communities has been systematically observed in the planetary boundary layer. While the factors suspected of affecting this seasonal change were hypothesized (e.g., changes in the surface conditions, meteorological parameters and global air circulation), our understanding on how these factors influence the temporal variation of airborne microbial communities, especially at the microbial taxon level, remains limited. Here, we investigated the distribution of both airborne bacterial and fungal communities on a weekly basis over more than one year at the mid-latitude and continental site of puy de Dame (France; +1465 m altitude above sea level). The seasonal shift in microbial community structure was likely correlated to the seasonal changes in the characteristics of puy de DOme's landscape (croplands and natural vegetation). The airborne microbial taxa that were the most affected by seasonal changes trended differently throughout the seasons in relation with their trophic mode. In addition, the windy and variable local meteorological conditions found at puy de Mine were likely responsible for the intraseasonal variability observed in the composition of airborne microbial communities. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据