4.7 Article

Conversion behaviors of litter-derived organic carbon of two halophytes in soil and their influence on SOC stabilization of wetland in the Yangtze River Estuary

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 716, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137109

关键词

P. communis; S. alterniflora; Plant-derived OC; Original SOC dynamic; Tidal flat development

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21876127]
  2. ChinaNational Key Research and Development Program [2017YFC0506004]
  3. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR, China [28300015, 18202116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil organic carbon (SOC) is both a product and a cause of soil development. Previous studies found that less carbon (C) is fixed by Phragmites communis than Spartina alterniflora in the Jiuduansha wetland of the Yangtze River Estuary. However, the P. communis zone presented higher contents of SOC and humus, which was mainly related to lower soil respiration (SR). It is not well known how different plants affect turnover of original SOC in the Jiuduansha wetland, and thus soil development and tidal flat evolution. In this study, in-field surveys and microcosm experiments were conducted to trace turnover of plant C and evaluate dynamics of SOC using stable C isotopic techniques. Spartina alterniflora decayed faster than P. communis, and more of its derived OC was lost through SR and leaching. Although S. alterniffora-derived OC suppressed the degradation of original SOC, it was consumed to a greater extent, making less supplementation to SOC. Phragmites communis-derived OC showed less degradability and accelerated the degradation of original SOC. but was more incorporated into new SOC and finally caused higher increase in SOC, specifically in bare tidal flat soil with poor original SOC. Overall, compared with S. alterniflora, P. communis-derived OC more effectively replaced the unstable original SOC. thereby improving the content and stability of SOC, especially for soil in early-development stages of tidal flats. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据