4.7 Article

Environmental evaluation of a distributed-centralized biomass pyrolysis system: A case study in Shandong, China

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 716, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136915

关键词

Aspen plus; Pyrolysis; Biorefinery; Life cycle assessment; Biomass residues

资金

  1. Beijing Forestry University hot-spot tracking project [200-121701284]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21838006, 21776159]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1902101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The limited quality of liquid product from the fast pyrolysis of biomass resources is a great obstacle to its large-scale application. Herein, a distributed-centralized agricultural straw pyrolysis (DCP) system with products of high market acceptance was implemented based on the design of a pilot plant and previous research. The system consisted of distributed pyrolysis workshops and a centralized upgrading factory that involved crude oil separation, hydrogen production, and hydrorefining. The crude fuel was separated by distillation before hydrotreatment, which avoids external hydrogen and energy consumption compared with direct hydrotreatment, and the hydrotreatment unit is independent of external hydrogen supply. The environmental impacts of a specific case designed for the northern region of Shandong province in China were evaluated using a life cycle assessment (LCA) method. LCA results indicated that abiotic depletion potential, acidification potential, global warming potential, ozone layer depletion potential, and human toxicity potential were primarily from fuel combustion, electricity, and N fertilizer. Eutrophication potential was primarily from the biomass production stage. Results demonstrated that the GWP of the system was -0.62 kg CO2.eq per kg crop straw. Comparison with the conventional straw incorporation method indicated the economic and social benefits of the DCP system, which is thus expected to be a promising option for crop residue disposal. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据