4.8 Article

Combinatorial Polymeric Conjugated Micelles with Dual Cytotoxic and Antiangiogenic Effects for the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 28, 期 17, 页码 6068-6079

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01280

关键词

-

资金

  1. AACP New Pharmacy Faculty Research Award Program
  2. Medical Research Foundation of Oregon New Investigator Grant
  3. Oregon State University-Startup fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emerging treatment paradigms like targeting the tumor microenvironment and/or dosing as part of a metronomic regimen are anticipated to produce better outcomes in ovarian cancer, but current drug delivery systems are lacking. We have designed and evaluated paclitaxel (PTX) and rapamycin (RAP) micellar systems that can be tailored for various dosing regimens and target tumor microenvironment. Individual and mixed PTX/RAP (MIX-M) micelles are prepared by conjugating drugs to a poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(beta-benzyl L-aspartate) using a pH-sensitive linker. The micelles release the drug(s) at pH 5.5 indicating preferential release in the acidic endosomal/lysosomal environment. Micelles exhibit antiproliferative effects in ovarian cell cancer lines (SKOV-3 (human caucasian ovarian adenocarcinoma) and ES2 (human ovarian clear cell carcinoma)) and an endothelial cell line (HUVEC; human umbilical vein endothelial cells) with the MIX-M being synergistic. The micelles also inhibited endothelial migration and tube formation. In healthy mice, micelles at 60 mg/kg/drug demonstrated no acute toxicity over 21 days. ES2 xenograft model efficacy studies at 20 mg/kg/drug dosed every 4 days and evaluated at 21 days indicate that the individual micelles exhibit antiangiogenic effects, while the MIX-M exhibited both antiangiogenic and apoptotic induction that results in significant tumor volume reduction. On the basis of our results, MIX-M micelles can be utilized to achieve synergistic apoptotic and antiangiogenic effects when treated at frequent low doses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据