4.8 Article

The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type-specific intracellular bacteria

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 368, 期 6494, 页码 973-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aay9189

关键词

-

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [2044/17]
  2. Binational Science Foundation [2013332]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [818086]
  4. Fabrikant-Morse Families Research Fund for Humanity
  5. Chantal d'Adesky Scheinberg Research Fund
  6. Moross Integrated Cancer Center
  7. Rising Tide Foundation
  8. Jacki and Bruce Barron Cancer Research Scholars' Program
  9. Israel Cancer Research Fund
  10. City of Hope (COH) - Harvey L. Miller Family Foundation
  11. Ministry of Science, Technology and Space, Israel [3-11174]
  12. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [P30CA033572]
  13. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas Research Training Program [RP170067]
  14. European Research Council (ERC) [818086] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  15. Directorate for STEM Education
  16. Division Of Undergraduate Education [2013332] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacteria were first detected in human tumors more than 100 years ago, but the characterization of the tumor microbiome has remained challenging because of its low biomass. We undertook a comprehensive analysis of the tumor microbiome, studying 1526 tumors and their adjacent normal tissues across seven cancer types, including breast, lung, ovary, pancreas, melanoma, bone, and brain tumors. We found that each tumor type has a distinct microbiome composition and that breast cancer has a particularly rich and diverse microbiome. The intratumor bacteria are mostly intracellular and are present in both cancer and immune cells. We also noted correlations between intratumor bacteria or their predicted functions with tumor types and subtypes, patients' smoking status, and the response to immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据