4.6 Article

Symptom burden and information needs in prostate cancer survivors: a case for tailored long-term survivorship care

期刊

BJU INTERNATIONAL
卷 118, 期 3, 页码 372-378

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bju.13329

关键词

survivorship; quality; information needs; tailoring; self-management

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health Training in Research for Behavioral Oncology
  2. VA HSR&D Career Development Award [2 (CDA 12-171)]
  3. VA HSRD IIR [12-116]
  4. Cancer Control Award [R25CA117865]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To determine the relationship between long-term prostate cancer survivors' symptom burden and information needs. Patients and Methods We used population-based data from the Michigan Prostate Cancer Survivor Study (2499 men). We examined unadjusted differences in long-term information needs according to symptom burden and performed multivariable logistic regression to examine symptom burden and information needs adjusting for patient characteristics. Results High symptom burden was reported across all domains (sexual 44.4%, urinary 14.4%, vitality 12.7%, bowel 8.4%, emotional 7.6%) with over half of respondents (56%) reporting they needed more information. Top information needs involved recurrence, relationships, and long-term effects. Prostate cancer survivors with high symptom burden more often searched for information regardless of domain (P < 0.05). High sexual burden was associated with greater need for information about relationships [odds ratio (OR) 2.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54-2.72] and long-term effects (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.23-2.07). High bowel burden was associated with greater information need for long-term effects (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.43-3.63). Conclusions Long-term prostate cancer survivors with high symptom burden need more supportive information. Tailoring information to these needs may be an efficient approach to support the growing population of long-term prostate cancer survivors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据