4.7 Article

Sonoprecipitation fabrication of enhanced electron transfer Cu(OH)2/g-C3N4 nanophotocatalyst with promoted H2-Production activity under visible light irradiation

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 91-100

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.135

关键词

Sonoprecipitation; Nanophotocatalyst; Non-precious cocatalyst; Water splitting; H-2 evolution

资金

  1. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
  2. Iran Nanotechnology Initiative Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of Cu(OH)(2)/g-C3N4 photocatalysts were fabricated via precipitation and sonoprecipitation. Various physicochemical and electrochemical techniques were employed to investigate the physical and optical properties of the samples, while their photocatalytic performance was studied based on the water splitting. Based on the observations, Cu(OH)(2) was nominated as an stable and highly efficient nonprecious cocatalyst for photocatalytic H-2 generation. 4Cu(OH)(2)/C3N4(U) sample demonstrated the highest performance (187 mu mol/h/g) among the other samples with various loading of Cu(OH)(2) which is 31 times higher than pure C3N4. This enhancement was because of the important role of Cu(OH)(2) as electron traps and active sites. Additionally, the photoactivity of the sono-synthesized photocatalyst was significantly higher than the one synthesized by precipitation method by 67%. The findings confirmed the promoting influence of ultrasound irradiation on providing well intimate cocatalyst-semiconductor interfacial contact, higher surface area and better dispersion of cocatalysts. This could facilitate the efficient transfer of electrons to cocatalyst and decrease charge carriers recombination where supported by PL, EIS and transient photocurrent results. This study addresses the sonochemical method as a promised rout for fabrication of a closely contact interface which is a key parameter to achieve more efficient noble metal free cocatalysts. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据