4.7 Article

Membrane fouling mitigation for enhanced water flux and high separation of humic acid and copper ion using hydrophilic polyurethane modified cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membranes

期刊

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
卷 150, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104538

关键词

Waste water treatment; Membrane fouling; Ultrafiltration; Humic acid; Copper ion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation, China [21777105]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Foundations, China [JCYJ20180507182040308, JCYJ20170818101137960]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of both copper ion (Cu (II)) from industry and humic acid (HA) in natural waters may generate Cu (II)-HA complex, which is a non-biodegradable and toxic organic pollutant in the water. Removal of such toxic substance is of great importance and environmental significance. Although membrane technology provides a solution for the removal via the filtration, fouling still presents a major challenge for the effective separation. In this study, polyurethanes endcapped with beta-cyclodextrin and lactic acid were synthesized and used as additives to be blended with cellulose acetate membranes, which possessed enhanced hydrophilicity, permeability and antifouling property for the removal of Cu (II) and HA. As an example, the polyurethane endcapped with lactic acid (LPU-CA) membrane exhibited high pure water flux (PWF) of 648 L m(-2) h(-1), as well as high flux recovery ratios (FRRs) of 97.8% and 92% and low irreversible fouling rate (F-ir) of 2.2% and 7.8% for the ultrafiltration (UF) of HA and Cu (II)-HA complex, respectively, showing excellent anti-fouling performance. In addition, the Cu (II) and HA rejection was greatly enhanced by the HA enhanced complexation process. These results indicated that the polyurethanes modified cellulose acetate membrane provided enhanced separation with good antifouling property, which can be potentially used for the cleaning of the toxic metal-organic pollutants in wastewaters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据