4.7 Article

Lithium-ion cell inconsistency analysis based on three-parameter Weibull probability model

期刊

RARE METALS
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 392-401

出版社

NONFERROUS METALS SOC CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s12598-020-01379-4

关键词

Lithium-ion cell; Voltage inconsistency evolution; Three-parameter Weibull probability model; Dispersion and symmetry of voltage distribution; Thermodynamic inconsistency; Kinetic inconsistency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U156405]
  2. GRINM Youth Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inconsistency of lithium-ion cells degrades battery performance, lifetime and even safety. The complexity of the cell reaction mechanism causes an irregular asymmetrical distribution of various cell parameters, such as capacity and internal resistance, among others. In this study, the Newman electrochemical model was used to simulate the 1C discharge curves of 100 LiMn2O4 pouch cells with parameter variations typically produced in manufacturing processes, and the three-parameter Weibull probability model was used to analyze the dispersion and symmetry of the resulting discharge voltage distributions. The results showed that the dispersion of the voltage distribution was related to the rate of decrease in the discharge voltage, and the symmetry was related to the change in the rate of voltage decrease. The effect of the cells' capacity dominated the voltage distribution thermodynamically during discharge, and the phase transformation process significantly skewed the voltage distribution. The effects of the ohmic drop and polarization voltage on the voltage distribution were primarily kinetic. The presence of current returned the right-skewed voltage distribution caused by phase transformation to a more symmetrical distribution. Thus, the Weibull parameters elucidated the electrochemical behavior during the discharge process, and this method can guide the prediction and control of cell inconsistency, as well as detection and control strategies for cell management systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据