4.6 Article

Patient radiation dose reduction using a commercial iterative reconstruction technique package

期刊

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108996

关键词

Computed tomography; Dose optimization; Dosimetry; Radiation risk

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University through the Fast-track Research Funding Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Computed tomography (CT) is the leading source of medical radiation, with approximately 2% of all cancers resulting from medical imaging exposures. The study found that using low dose techniques can reduce radiation dose by up to 48% without affecting image quality.
With 75.4% of the effective doses from imaging estimated to result from computed tomography (CT), it is the leading source of medical radiation. This important observation links with a further estimate that some 2% of all cancers are a result of medical imaging exposures. Acknowledging justification and optimization to be key towards preventing unnecessary radiation exposure, present study aims to investigate radiation exposures reduction for patients undergoing multiphase CT abdomen. Study was made of 111 CT examinations, use being made of two imaging protocols. Of these cases, 55 (49.5%) were obtained using a standard imaging protocol, the remainder being studied using the pure 3D (Sure)Exposure (TM) low-dose technique to obtain a complete abdomen multi-phase examination. Image quality was the subject of blind analysis by two experienced radiologists. For the standard imaging protocol, the mean and standard deviation for CTDIvol and DLP were respectively 7.2 +/- 2.3 mGy and 1325 +/- 605 mGy cm. For the pure 3D (Sure)Exposure (TM) low-dose technique the respective values were 5.2 +/- 1.6 mGy and 812 +/- 157 mGy cm. With an achieved mean dose reduction of up to 48%, use of the low dose techniques offers appreciable potential for dose saving without affecting the image quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据