4.3 Article

Adaptation, acceptability and feasibility of a Short Food Survey to assess the dietary intake of children during attendance at childcare

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 1484-1494

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S136898001900404X

关键词

Nutrition; Child; Food intake; Childcare; Educators; Validity

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [APP1102943]
  2. Cancer Council NSW [PG 16-05]
  3. Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle
  4. NHMRC or Cancer Council NSW Hunter New England Population Health
  5. University of Newcastle
  6. Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Researcher Award
  7. Hunter New England Population Health
  8. Health Research and Translation Centre, Partnerships, Innovation and Research, Hunter New England Local Health District

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To (i) describe the adaptation of the Short Food Survey (SFS) for assessing the dietary intake of children (2-5 years) during attendance at Early Childhood Education and Care (SFS-ECEC); (ii) determine the acceptability and feasibility of the SFS-ECEC; and (iii) compare the SFS-ECEC to direct observations for assessing dietary intake of children in care. Design: The adapted forty-seven-item SFS-ECEC was completed by childcare educators to capture individual child's usual intake over the past month. Acceptability and feasibility were assessed via educator self-report and completion rates. Mean servings of food groups consumed in accordance with dietary guidelines reported in the SFS-ECEC were compared to those obtained by a single-day direct observation via visual estimation conducted by trained personnel. Mean differences, intra-class correlations, Bland-Altman plots, percentage agreement and Cohen's kappa were examined. Setting: Early Childhood Education and Care, NSW, Australia. Participants: Educators and children. Results: 213 (98 center dot 61 %) SFS-ECECs were returned. Acceptability was high with 86 center dot 54 % of educators reporting the tool as easy to understand. Mean differences in servings of food groups between the SFS-ECEC and direct observation were statistically significantly different for five out of six foods and ranged 0 center dot 08-1 center dot 07, with intra-class correlations ranging 0 center dot 00-0 center dot 21. Agreement between the methods in the classification of children meeting or not meeting dietary guidelines ranged 42 center dot 78-93 center dot 01 %, with Cohen's kappa ranging -0 center dot 03 to 0 center dot 14. Conclusions: The SFS-ECEC is acceptable and feasible for completion by childcare educators. While tool refinement and further validation is warranted, small mean differences suggest the tool may be useful in estimating group-level intakes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据