4.7 Review

PLA2G4E, a candidate gene for resilience in Alzheimer's disease and a new target for dementia treatment

期刊

PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101818

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Resilience; PLA2G4E; Gene expression; Gene therapy

资金

  1. Health department of Gobierno de Navarra
  2. European Regional Development Fund through the 2014 ERDF Operational Program-2020
  3. Foundation for Applied Medical Research, the University of Navarra (Pamplona, Spain)
  4. Asociacion de Amigos of the University of Navarra

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical studies revealed that some aged-individuals accumulate a significant number of histopathological Alzheimer's disease (AD) lesions in their brain, yet without developing any signs of dementia. Animal models of AD represent suitable tools to identify genes that might promote cognitive resilience and hence, this study first set out to identify cognitively resilient individuals in the aged-Tg2576 mouse model. A transcriptomic analysis of these mice identified PLA2G4E as a gene that might confer resistance to dementia. Indeed, a significant decrease in PLA2G4E is evident in the brain of late-stage AD patients, whereas no such changes are observed in early stage patients with AD neuropathological lesions but no signs of dementia. We demonstrated that adeno-associated viral vector-mediated overexpression of PLA2G4E in hippocampal neurons completely restored cognitive deficits in elderly APP/PS1 mice, without affecting the amyloid or tau pathology. These PLA2G4E overexpressing APP/ PS1 mice developed significantly more dendritic spines than sham-injected mice, coinciding with the cognitive improvement observed. Hence, these results support the idea that a loss of PLA2G4E might play a key role in the onset of dementia in AD, highlighting the potential of PLA2G4E overexpression as a novel therapeutic strategy to manage AD and other disorders that course with memory deficits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据