4.8 Article

Twin-chain polymer hydrogels based on poly(vinyl alcohol) as new advanced tool for the cleaning of modern and contemporary art

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1911811117

关键词

poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel; semiinterpenetrated gels networks; cultural heritage conservation; modern art; contemporary art

资金

  1. Italian Consorzio Interuniversitario per lo Sviluppo dei Sistemi a Grande Interfase (Center for Colloid and Surface Science)
  2. European Union Horizon 2020 project NANORESTART (Nanomaterials for the Restoration of Works of Art) under Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [646063]
  3. European Union Horizon 2020 project APACHE (Active & Intelligent Packaging Materials and Display Cases as a Tool for Preventive Conservation of Cultural Heritage), under Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [814496]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conservation of our cultural heritage is fundamental for conveying to future generations our culture, traditions, and ways of thinking and behaving. Cleaning art, in particular modern/contemporary paintings, with traditional tools could be risky and impractical, particularly on large collections of important works to be transferred to future generations. We report on advanced cleaning systems, based on twin-chain polymer networks made of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) chains, semiinterpenetrated (semi-IPN) with PVA of lower molecular weight (L-PVA). Interpenetrating L-PVA causes a change from gels with oriented channels to sponge-like semi-IPNs with disordered interconnected pores, conferring different gel (and solvent) dynamics. These features grant residue-free, time efficient cleaning capacity and effective dirt capture, defeating risks for the artifact, making possible a safer treatment of important collections, unconceivable with conventional methods. We report as an example the conservation of Jackson Pollock's masterpieces, cleaned in a controlled way, safety and selectivity with unprecedented performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据