4.8 Article

15-Epi-LXA4 and 17-epi-RvD1 restore TLR9-mediated impaired neutrophil phagocytosis and accelerate resolution of lung inflammation

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1920193117

关键词

resolution of inflammation; phagocytosis; neutrophils; TLR9; aspirin-triggered LXA4 and RvD1

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-97742, MOP-102619]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Timely resolution of bacterial infections critically depends on phagocytosis of invading pathogens by polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocytes (PMNs), followed by PMN apoptosis and efferocytosis. Here we report that bacterial DNA (CpG DNA) and mitochondrial DNA impair phagocytosis and attenuate phagocytosis-induced apoptosis in human PMNs through Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9)-mediated release of neutrophil elastase and proteinase 3 and subsequent down-regulation of the complement receptor C5aR. Consistently, CpG DNA delays pulmonary clearance of Escherichia coli in mice and suppresses PMN apoptosis, efferocytosis, and generation of pro-resolving lipid mediators, thereby prolonging lung inflammation evoked by E. coli. Genetic deletion of TLR9 renders mice unresponsive to CpG DNA. We also show that aspirin-triggered 15-epi-lipoxin A4 (15-epi-LXA4) and 17-epi-resolvin D1 (17-epi-RvD1) through the receptor ALX/FPR2 antagonize cues from CpG DNA, preserve C5aR expression, restore impaired phagocytosis, and redirect human PMNs to apoptosis. Treatment of mice with 15-epi-LXA4 or 17-epi-RvD1 at the peak of inflammation accelerates clearance of bacteria, blunts PMN accumulation, and promotes PMN apoptosis and efferocytosis, thereby facilitating resolution of E. coli-evoked lung injury. Collectively, these results uncover a TLR9-mediated endogenous mechanism that impairs PMN phagocytosis and prolongs inflammation, and demonstrate both endogenous and therapeutic potential for 15-epi-LXA4 and 17-epi-RvD1 to restore impaired bacterial clearance and facilitate resolution of acute lung inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据