4.8 Article

Tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1 receptor is a tumor suppressor and mediates resistance to PD-1 blockade therapy

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1921445117

关键词

tumor cell-intrinsic PD-1; tumor cell-intrinsic PD-L1; biomarker; tumor suppressor; drug resistance

资金

  1. Strategic Pilot Science and Technology Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB29040103]
  2. Frontier Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-SMC038]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81773023, 81802526]
  4. National Key Research and Development (R&D) Program of China [2016YFC1302103]
  5. Technological Innovation Project of Shanxi Transformation and Comprehensive Reform Demonstration Zone [2017KJCX01]
  6. One-Hundred Talent of Shanxi Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor on the surface of immune cells is an immune checkpoint molecule that mediates the immune escape of tumor cells. Consequently, antibodies targeting PD-1 have shown efficacy in enhancing the antitumor activity of T cells in some types of cancers. However, the potential effects of PD-1 on tumor cells remain largely unknown. Here, we show that PD-1 is expressed across a broad range of tumor cells. The silencing of PD-1 or its ligand, PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), promotes cell proliferation and colony formation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Conversely, overexpression of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibits tumor cell proliferation and colony formation. Moreover, blocking antibodies targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 promote tumor growth in cell cultures and xenografts. Mechanistically, the coordination of PD-1 and PD-L1 activates its major downstream signaling pathways including the AKT and ERK1/2 pathways, thus enhancing tumor cell growth. This study demonstrates that PD-1/PD-L1 is a potential tumor suppressor and potentially regulates the response to anti-PD-1/ PD-L1 treatments, thus representing a potential biomarker for the optimal cancer immunotherapeutic treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据