4.8 Article

Trait velocities reveal that mortality has driven widespread coordinated shifts in forest hydraulic trait composition

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1917521117

关键词

community trait assemblage; drought; forest inventory; mortality; species diversity

资金

  1. US Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2018-67012-28020]
  2. David and Lucille Packard Foundation
  3. NSF [1714972, 1802880]
  4. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural and Food Research Initiative Competitive Programme, Ecosystem Services and Agro-ecosystem Management [2018-67019-27850]
  5. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Climate and Global Change Fellowship)
  6. National Science Foundation [DBI-1711243]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the driving mechanisms behind existing patterns of vegetation hydraulic traits and community trait diversity is critical for advancing predictions of the terrestrial carbon cycle because hydraulic traits affect both ecosystem and Earth system responses to changing water availability. Here, we leverage an extensive trait database and a long-term continental forest plot network to map changes in community trait distributions and quantify trait velocities (the rate of change in community-weighted traits) for different regions and different forest types across the United States from 2000 to the present. We show that diversity in hydraulic traits and photosynthetic characteristics is more related to local water availability than overall species diversity. Finally, we find evidence for coordinated shifts toward communities with more drought-tolerant traits driven by tree mortality, but the magnitude of responses differs depending on forest type. The hydraulic trait distribution maps provide a publicly available platform to fundamentally advance understanding of community trait change in response to climate change and predictive abilities of mechanistic vegetation models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据