4.5 Article

Effect of thickness and starch phthalate/starch content on the degradability of LDPE/silane-modified nanosilica films: a comparative parametric optimization

期刊

POLYMER BULLETIN
卷 78, 期 4, 页码 2287-2328

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00289-020-03213-4

关键词

Degradability; Central composite design; Optimization; Biofiller; Thickness

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of West Bengal [ST/P/ST/IG-9/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on the parametric optimization of LDPE blended silane-modified nanosilica films with different compositions of starch/starch phthalate using central composite design approach of response surface methodology. The results indicated that the optimized conditions are required for high biodegradation and superior mechanical properties under specific conditions.
Parametric optimization for the enhancement of mechanical properties and biodegradability for LDPE blended silane-modified nanosilica films with different compositions of starch/starch phthalate has been studied by central composite design approach of response surface methodology. The effect of thickness of the films on the biodegradability and the applicability range has been analysed. Statistical analysis of the mechanical degradability and biodegradability in both garden soil and vegetable waste environments was tested. The results obtained suggest that at a starch content of 10% and a thickness of 586.192 and 350 micron the maximum tensile and tear strength of 11.71 MPa and 210.31 N/mm could be achieved, whereas for modified starch film, 30% biofiller content and 495.38 micron thickness showed the maximum tensile (12.401 MPa) and tear (215.137 N/mm) strength. Biodegradability of the films was found to be maximum (14.80% for starch and 15.74% for starch phthalate films) in garden soil for 350-micron film containing 30% starch/starch phthalate content. The optimized conditions suggest the optimum thickness and biofiller content are required for high biodegradation and superior mechanical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据