4.6 Article

Molecular subtypes in canine hemangiosarcoma reveal similarities with human angiosarcoma

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229728

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sarcoma Pilot Grant from Abramson Cancer Center's sarcoma program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare neoplasm with limited treatment options and a poor survival rate. Development of effective therapies is hindered by the rarity of this disease. Dogs spontaneously develop hemangiosarcoma (HSA), a common, histologically similar neoplasm. Metastatic disease occurs rapidly and despite chemotherapy, most dogs die several months after diagnosis. These features suggest that HSA might provide a tractable model to test experimental therapies in clinical trials. We previously reported whole exome sequencing of 20 HSA cases. Here we report development of a NGS targeted resequencing panel to detect driver mutations in HSA and other canine tumors. We validated the panel by resequencing the original 20 cases and sequenced 30 additional cases. Overall, we identified potential driver mutations in over 90% of the cases, including well-documented (in human cancers) oncogenic mutations in PIK3CA (46%), PTEN (6%), PLCG1(4%), and TP53 (66%), as well as previously undetected recurrent activating mutations in NRAS (24%). The driver role of these mutations is further demonstrated by augmented downstream signaling crucial to tumor growth. The recurrent, mutually exclusive mutation patterns suggest distinct molecular subtypes of HSA. Driver mutations in some subtypes closely resemble those seen in some AS cases, including NRAS, PLCG1, PIK3CA and TP53. Furthermore, activation of the MAPK and PI3K pathways appear to be key oncogenic mechanisms in both species. Together, these observations suggest that dogs with spontaneous HSA could serve as a useful model for testing the efficacy of targeted therapies, some of which could potentially be of therapeutic value in AS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据