4.8 Article

Increased Power and Accuracy of Causal Locus Identification in Time Series Genome-wide Association in Sorghum1[OPEN]

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 183, 期 4, 页码 1898-1909

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.20.00277

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division seed grant
  2. National Science Foundation [OIA-1557417]
  3. Nebraska Research Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Applying functional principal component analyses to time series genome-wide association studies increases the power and accuracy of gene identification in a sorghum association panel. The phenotypes of plants develop over time and change in response to the environment. New engineering and computer vision technologies track these phenotypic changes. Identifying the genetic loci regulating differences in the pattern of phenotypic change remains challenging. This study used functional principal component analysis (FPCA) to achieve this aim. Time series phenotype data were collected from a sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) diversity panel using a number of technologies including conventional color photography and hyperspectral imaging. This imaging lasted for 37 d and centered on reproductive transition. A new higher density marker set was generated for the same population. Several genes known to control trait variation in sorghum have been previously cloned and characterized. These genes were not confidently identified in genome-wide association analyses at single time points. However, FPCA successfully identified the same known and characterized genes. FPCA analyses partitioned the role these genes play in controlling phenotypes. Partitioning was consistent with the known molecular function of the individual cloned genes. These data demonstrate that FPCA-based genome-wide association studies can enable robust time series mapping analyses in a wide range of contexts. Moreover, time series analysis can increase the accuracy and power of quantitative genetic analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据