4.6 Article

Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation of the aquatic carnivorous plant Utricularia gibba

期刊

PLANT METHODS
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13007-020-00592-7

关键词

Agrobacterium tumefaciens; Genetic transformation; Carnivorous plant

资金

  1. Basic Science program from CONACytT [00126261]
  2. Governor University Research Initiative program from the State of Texas [05-2018]
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute [55005946]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe genus Utricularia belongs to Lentibulariaceae, the largest family of carnivorous plants, which includes terrestrial, epiphytic and aquatic species. The development of specialized structures that evolved for carnivory is a feature of this genus that has been of great interest to biologists since Darwin's early studies. Utricularia gibba is itself an aquatic plant with sophisticated bladder traps having one of the most complex suction mechanisms for trapping prey. However, the molecular characterization of the mechanisms that regulate trap development and the biophysical processes involved in prey trapping are still largely unknown due to the lack of a simple and reproducible gene transfer system.ResultsHere, we report the establishment of a simple, fast and reproducible protocol for genetic transformation of U. gibba based on the T-DNA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. An in vitro selection system using Phosphinotricin as a selective agent was established for U. gibba. Plant transformation was confirmed by histochemical GUS assays and PCR and qRT-PCR analyses. We report on the expression pattern of the 35S promoter and of the promoter of a trap-specific ribonuclease gene in transgenic U. gibba plants.ConclusionsThe genetic transformation protocol reported here is an effective method for studying developmental biology and functional genomics of this genus of carnivorous plants and advances the utility of U. gibba as a model system to study developmental processes involved in trap formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据