4.8 Article

Survival in the Tropics despite isolation, inbreeding and asexual reproduction: insights from the genome of the world's southernmost poplar (Populus ilicifolia)

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 430-442

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14744

关键词

conservation genomics; genetic diversity; inbreeding; genetic load; tropical adaptation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41871044, 31922061, 31561123001, 41571054, 31500502]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0600101]
  3. National Key Project for Basic Research [2012CB114504]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018CDDY-S02-SCU, SCU2019D013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Species are becoming extinct at unprecedented rates as a consequence of human activity. Hence it is important to understand the evolutionary dynamics of species with already small population sizes. Populus ilicifolia is a vulnerable poplar species that is isolated from other poplar species and is uniquely adapted to the Tropics. It has a very limited size, reproduces partly clonally and is therefore an excellent case study for conservation genomics. We present here the first annotated draft genome of P. ilicifolia, characterize genome-wide patterns of polymorphisms and compare those to other poplar species with larger natural ranges. P. ilicifolia experienced a more prolonged and severe decline of effective population size (N-e) and signs of genetic erosion than any other poplar species with which it was compared. At present, the species has the lowest genome-wide genetic diversity, the highest abundance of long runs of homozygosity, high inbreeding levels as well as a high overall accumulation of deleterious variants. However, more effective purging of severely deleterious variants and adaptation to the Tropics may have contributed to its survival. Hence, in spite of its limited genetic variation, it is certainly worth pursuing the conservation efforts of this unique species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据