4.8 Article

Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian control of splicing events in Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 103, 期 2, 页码 889-902

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14776

关键词

circadian clock; circadian rhythms; alternative splicing; splicing factors; SPF30; Arabidopsis thaliana

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT)
  2. International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB)
  3. Comision Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas (CONICET)
  4. Fundacion Bunge y Born (FBB)
  5. CONICET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The circadian clock of Arabidopsis thaliana controls many physiological and molecular processes, allowing plants to anticipate daily changes in their environment. However, developing a detailed understanding of how oscillations in mRNA levels are connected to oscillations in co/post-transcriptional processes, such as splicing, has remained a challenge. Here we applied a combined approach using deep transcriptome sequencing and bioinformatics tools to identify novel circadian-regulated genes and splicing events. Using a stringent approach, we identified 300 intron retention, eight exon skipping, 79 alternative 3 ' splice site usage, 48 alternative 5 ' splice site usage, and 350 multiple (more than one event type) annotated events under circadian regulation. We also found seven and 721 novel alternative exonic and intronic events. Depletion of the circadian-regulated splicing factor AtSPF30 homologue resulted in the disruption of a subset of clock-controlled splicing events. Altogether, our global circadian RNA-seq coupled with an in silico, event-centred, splicing analysis tool offers a new approach for studying the interplay between the circadian clock and the splicing machinery at a global scale. The identification of many circadian-regulated splicing events broadens our current understanding of the level of control that the circadian clock has over this co/post-transcriptional regulatory layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据