4.7 Article

Transcriptomic identification and characterization of genes responding to sublethal doses of three different insecticides in the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.104596

关键词

Western flower thrips; Insecticide; Sublethal dose; Tolerance; Transcriptome analysis; Cytochrome P450s

资金

  1. Rural Development Administration (RDA) of Korea [PJ013356]
  2. Brain Korea 21 program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pretreatment with sublethal concentrations (LC10) of three insecticides (chlorfenapyr, dinotefuran, and spinosad) enhanced tolerance to a lethal dose of the respective insecticide in the Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. To identify genes responding to sublethal treatment with insecticides, transcriptome analysis was conducted for thrips treated with LC10 of the three insecticides. When based on a fold change > 1.5 or < -1.5 as a selection criterion, 199 transcripts were commonly up-regulated, whereas 31 transcripts were commonly down-regulated following all three insecticide treatments. The differential expression levels of representative genes were validated by quantitative PCR. Most over-transcribed transcripts could be categorized as basic biological processes, such as proteolysis and lipid metabolism. Detoxification genes, such as one glutathione S transferase S1, three UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, four CYP450s, and one ABC transporter G family member 20, were commonly overexpressed in all three insecticide-treated groups. Knockdown of the five representative commonly overexpressed genes via ingestion RNA interference increased mortalities to all the three WA insecticides, supporting their common role in tolerance induction. In contrast, three C2H2-type zinc finger-containing proteins were significantly down-regulated in all insecticide-treated thrip groups. Since the tested insecticides have distinct structures and modes of action, the roles of commonly expressed genes in tolerance were discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据