4.4 Review

Neurological Monitoring and Complications of Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support

期刊

PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 31-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.03.014

关键词

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Seizures; Stroke; Intracranial hemorrhage; Electroencephalography

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P50 HD103538] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS106292, K23 NS099472] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is extracorporeal life support for life-threatening cardiopulmonary failure. Since its introduction, the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has expanded to patients with more complex comorbidities without change in patient mortality rates. Although many patients survive, significant neurological complications like seizures, ischemic strokes, and intracranial hemorrhage can occur during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation care. The risks of these complications often add to the complexity of decision-making surrounding extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. In this review, we discuss the pathophysiology and incidence of neurological complications in children supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, factors influencing the incidence of these complications, commonly used neurological monitoring modalities, and outcomes for this complex patient population. We discuss the current literature on the use of electroencephalography for both seizure detection and monitoring of background electroencephalographic changes, in addition to the use of less commonly used imaging modalities like transcranial Doppler. We summarize the knowledge gaps and the lack of clinical consensus guidelines for managing these potentially life-changing neurological complications. Finally, we discuss future work to further understand the pathophysiology of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-related neurological complications. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据