4.4 Article

Plasma oxalate levels in primary hyperoxaluria type I show significant intra-individual variation and do not correlate with kidney function

期刊

PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 1227-1233

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-020-04531-5

关键词

Primary hyperoxaluria; Plasma oxalate; Clinical trials; Endpoint

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Primary hyperoxalurias are rare diseases with endogenous overproduction of oxalate, thus leading to hyperoxaluria, hyperoxalemia, urolithiasis, and/or nephrocalcinosis and eventually early kidney failure. Plasma oxalate (POx) is an important diagnostic parameter in clinical studies on primary hyperoxaluria (PH). This is especially the case in kidney failure, where urinary parameters are no longer suitable. We aimed to evaluate whether POx would be an adequate endpoint for clinical studies in PH patients with stable kidney function. In addition, the correlation of POx to serum creatinine (SCr) and calculated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was examined. Methods We retrospectively analyzed follow-up of individual POx values over time, as well as POx correlation to SCr, eGFR, and vitamin B6 (VB6), a common therapeutic in PH1. Results from 187 blood samples taken between 2009 and 2017, during routine laboratory evaluations from 41 patients with PH1 who had neither undergone dialysis nor transplantation, were evaluated. Results Negligibly low correlation coefficients (CCs) between POx vs. SCr (CC = -0.0950), POx vs. eGFR (CC = -0.1237), and POx vs. VB6 (CC = 0.1879) were found, with the exception of CKD stage 3a patients, who showed a positive correlation (CC of - 0.7329, POx vs eGFR). The intra-individual analysis of POx over time showed a high fluctuation of POx values. Conclusion We conclude that POx has a limited validity as a primary endpoint for clinical studies in PH1 patients with stable kidney function. In addition, it does not correlate to SCr and eGFR in this group of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据