4.7 Article

Bakuchiol augments MyoD activation leading to enhanced myoblast differentiation

期刊

CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS
卷 248, 期 -, 页码 60-67

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbi.2016.02.008

关键词

Bakuchiol; Myoblast differentiation; MyoD; Myogenic conversion; Muscle regeneration; p38MAPK

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [2011-0030074]
  2. SRC Research Center for Women's Diseases of Sookmyung Women's University
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0030074] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myoblast differentiation is fundamental to skeletal muscle development and regeneration after injury and defects in this process are implicated in muscle atrophy associated with aging or pathological conditions. MyoD family transcription factors function as mater regulators in induction of muscle-specific genes during myoblast differentiation. We have identified bakuchiol, a prenylated phenolic monoterpene, as an inducer of MyoD-mediated transcription and myogenic differentiation. C2C12 myoblasts treated with bakuchiol exhibit enhanced muscle-specific gene expression and myotube formation. A key promyogenic kinase p38MAPK is activated dramatically by bakuchiol which in turn induced the formation of MyoD/E protein active transcription complexes. Consistently, the recruitment of MyoD and Baf60c to the Myogenin promoter is enhanced in bakuchiol-treated myoblasts. Furthermore, bakuchiol rescues defective p38MAPK activation and myogenic differentiation caused by Cdo-depletion or in RD rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Taken together, these results indicate that bakuchiol enhances myogenic differentiation through p38MAPK and MyoD activation. Thus bakuchiol can be developed into a potential agent to improve muscular regeneration and repair to treat muscular atrophy. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据