4.7 Article

Transfer learning-based discriminative correlation filter for visual tracking

期刊

PATTERN RECOGNITION
卷 100, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2019.107157

关键词

Visual tracking; Discriminative correlation filter; Instance-Transfer; Probability-Transfer

资金

  1. Major Science Instrument Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [61527802]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [61371132, 61471043]
  3. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2014DFR10960]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most Correlation Filter (CF)-based tracking methods can hardly handle occlusion or severe deformation, due to the lack of effective utilization of previous target information. To overcome this, we propose a novel Transfer Learning-based Discriminative Correlation Filter (TLDCF), which extracts knowledge from multiple previous tracking tasks and applies the knowledge for a new tracking task through Instance-Transfer Learning (ITL) and Probability-Transfer Learning (PTL). ITL applies knowledge of Gaussian Mixture Modelling (GMM) target representations and multi-channel filters learned in previous frames to directly train a new correlation filter. This improves the robustness of tracker for heavy occlusion and large appearance variations. Meanwhile, PTL encodes the spatio-temporal relationship predicted by Kalman Filter (KF) into a shared Gaussian prior to suppress huge location drift caused by similar targets. For optimization, we develop an efficient Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) based algorithm to calculate CFs on each independent channel in real time. Extensive experiments on OTB-2013 and OTB-2015 datasets well demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. In particular, our method improves AUC score of the two datasets by 5.5% and 3.9% respectively compared to baseline, and achieves competitive performance against recent state-of-the-art deep trackers. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据