4.8 Review

Dye-sensitised semiconductors modified with molecular catalysts for light-driven H-2 production

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 45, 期 1, 页码 9-23

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/C5CS00733J

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC (DTG scholarship) [EP/H00338X/2]
  2. Christian Doppler Research Association (Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy)
  3. Christian Doppler Research Association (National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development)
  4. OMV Group
  5. Advanced Institute for Materials Research-Cambridge Joint Research Centre
  6. European Commission Marie Curie CIG [303650]
  7. ERC [291482]
  8. EPSRC [EP/H00338X/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H00338X/2, 1230594] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of synthetic systems for the conversion of solar energy into chemical fuels is a research goal that continues to attract growing interest owing to its potential to provide renewable and storable energy in the form of a 'solar fuel'. Dye-sensitised photocatalysis (DSP) with molecular catalysts is a relatively new approach to convert sunlight into a fuel such as H-2 and is based on the self-assembly of a molecular dye and electrocatalyst on a semiconductor nanoparticle. DSP systems combine advantages of both homogenous and heterogeneous photocatalysis, with the molecular components providing an excellent platform for tuning activity and understanding performance at defined catalytic sites, whereas the semiconductor bridge ensures favourable multi-electron transfer kinetics between the dye and the fuel-forming electrocatalyst. In this tutorial review, strategies and challenges for the assembly of functional molecular DSP systems and experimental techniques for their evaluation are explained. Current understanding of the factors governing electron transfer across inorganic-molecular interfaces is described and future directions and challenges for this field are outlined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据