4.8 Review

Hierarchical photocatalysts

期刊

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
卷 45, 期 9, 页码 2603-2636

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cs00838g

关键词

-

资金

  1. 973 Program [2013CB632402]
  2. NSFC [21433007, 51320105001, 51372190, 51272199, 20906034]
  3. Deanship of Scientific Research of King Abdulaziz University [90-130-35-HiCi]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2015-III-034]
  5. Self-determined and Innovative Research Funds of SKLWUT [2015-ZD-1]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China [2015CFA001]
  7. Industry and Research Collaborative Innovation Major Projects of Guangzhou [201508020098]
  8. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Material Synthesis and Processing (Wuhan University of Technology) [2015-KF-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a green and sustainable technology, semiconductor-based heterogeneous photocatalysis has received much attention in the last few decades because it has potential to solve both energy and environmental problems. To achieve efficient photocatalysts, various hierarchical semiconductors have been designed and fabricated at the micro/nanometer scale in recent years. This review presents a critical appraisal of fabrication methods, growth mechanisms and applications of advanced hierarchical photocatalysts. Especially, the different synthesis strategies such as two-step templating, in situ template-sacrificial dissolution, self-templating method, in situ template-free assembly, chemically induced self-transformation and post-synthesis treatment are highlighted. Finally, some important applications including photocatalytic degradation of pollutants, photocatalytic H-2 production and photocatalytic CO2 reduction are reviewed. A thorough assessment of the progress made in photocatalysis may open new opportunities in designing highly effective hierarchical photocatalysts for advanced applications ranging from thermal catalysis, separation and purification processes to solar cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据