4.6 Article

Doublet metalens design for high numerical aperture and simultaneous correction of chromatic and monochromatic aberrations

期刊

OPTICS EXPRESS
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 18059-18076

出版社

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.387794

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2B5B02002730]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2B5B02002730] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metalens is one of the most prominent applications among metasurfaces since it gives possibilities to replace the conventional lenses for compactness and multi-functionalities. Recently, many studies have been demonstrated to overcome the aberrations of the metalenses for high performance practical applications. Previous studies have used the methods that control the dispersion of meta-atoms for correcting chromatic aberrations and use doublet platform for correcting monochromatic aberrations. Despite these studies and the large demands for simultaneous correction of the aberrations in high numerical aperture metalens, the simultaneous correction has not been demonstrated yet. In this paper, we report the doublet metalens design with high numerical aperture which corrects longitudinal chromatic aberration and four monochromatic aberrations including spherical aberration, coma, astigmatism, and field curvature simultaneously for the three primary visible colors. Based on the novel doublet platform, the multi-wavelength targeted correction lens and geometric phase lens with color filtering functionality are utilized. Our doublet metalens has numerical apertures of 0.33, 0.38, and 0.47 for 445 nm, 532 nm, and 660 nm, respectively. The back focal length of our doublet metalens remains nearly 360 pm for target wavelengths and incident angles up to 30 degrees. (C) 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据