4.7 Article

Selecting data envelopment analysis models: A data-driven application to EU countries

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102248

关键词

Data envelopment analysis; Data-driven; Selective factors; Variable returns-to-scale; Input and output orientations; Structural efficiency

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation [GACR 19-13946S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a method for evaluating the efficiency of decision-making units. This study aims to develop selecting DEA models to narrow down performance factors and to assess efficiency at both individual and industry levels. A case study on EU countries is presented for insights into business innovation, social economy, and growth.
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric data-driven approach for evaluating the efficiency of a set of homogeneous decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. The number of performance factors (inputs and outputs) plays a crucial role when applying DEA to real-world applications. In other words, if the number of performance factors is significantly greater than the number of DMUs, it is highly possible to arrive at a large portion of efficient DMUs, which practically may become problematic due to the lack of ample discrimination among DMUs. The current research aims to develop an array of selecting DEA models to narrow down the performance factors based upon a rule of thumb. To this end, we show that the input-and output-oriented selecting DEA models may select different factors and then present the integrated models to identify a set of common factors for both orientations. In addition to efficiency evaluation at the individual level, we study structural efficiency with a single production unit at the industry level. Finally, a case study on the EU countries is presented to give insight into business innovation, social economy and growth with regard to the efficiency of the EU countries and entire EU. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据