4.8 Review

Ras Conformational Ensembles, Allostery, and Signaling

期刊

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
卷 116, 期 11, 页码 6607-6665

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00542

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB910403]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81322046, 81302698, 81473137]
  3. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [13QA1402300]
  4. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0355]
  5. Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission [20154Y0058]
  6. Collaborative Innovation Center of Systems Biomedicine
  7. TUBITAK Research Grant [114M196]
  8. Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Institutes of Health [HHSN261200800001E]
  9. Intramural Research Program of NIH, Frederick National Lab, Center for Cancer Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ras proteins are classical members of small GTPases that function as molecular switches by alternating between inactive GDP-bound and active GTP-bound states. Ras activation is regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors that catalyze the exchange of GDP by GTP, and inactivation is terminated by GTPase-activating proteins that accelerate the intrinsic GTP hydrolysis rate by orders of magnitude. In this review, we focus on data that have accumulated over the past few years pertaining to the conformational ensembles and the allosteric regulation of Ras proteins and their interpretation from our conformational landscape standpoint. The Ras ensemble embodies all states, including the ligand-bound conformations, the activated (or inactivated) allosteric modulated states, post-translationally modified states, mutational states, transition states, and nonfunctional states serving as a reservoir for emerging functions. The ensemble is shifted by distinct mutational events, cofactors, post-translational modifications, and different membrane compositions. A better understanding of Ras biology can contribute to therapeutic strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据