4.6 Article

Indoor radon and thoron from building materials: Analysis of humidity, air exchange rate, and dose assessment

期刊

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 52, 期 10, 页码 2370-2378

出版社

KOREAN NUCLEAR SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.net.2020.03.013

关键词

Natural radioactivity; Indoor environment; Radon-thoron exhalation rate; Building material; Radiological risk

资金

  1. KOREA HYDRO & NUCLEAR POWER CO., LTD (K-CLOUD Project) [2017-TECH-08]
  2. Ministry of Research and Technology of Indonesia through Research and Innovation in Science and Technology Project (RISET) [8245]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Building materials contribute significantly to the indoor radon and thoron levels. Therefore, parameters that influence the exhalation rates of radon and thoron from building material need to be analyzed closely. As a preliminary study, the effects of humidity on exhalation rates were measured using a system with an accumulation chamber and RAD7 detector for Korean brick, Korean soil, and Indonesian brick. Resulting doses to a person who resides in a room constructed from the building materials were assessed by UNSCEAR method for different air exchange rates. The measurements have revealed that Korean brick exhaled the highest radon and thoron while Indonesian brick exhaled the lowest thoron. Results showed that for a typical low dense material, radon and thoron exhalation rate will increase until reached its maximum at a certain value of humidity and will remain saturated above it. Analysis on concentration and effective dose showed that radon is strongly affected by air exchange rate (ACH). This is showed by about 66 times decrease of radon dose from 0.00 h(-1) to those of 0.50 h(-1) ACH and decrease by a factor of 2 from 0.50 h(-1) to those of 0.80 h(-1). In case of thoron, the ACH doesn't have significant effects on effective dose. (c) 2020 Korean Nuclear Society, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据