4.6 Article

Drought-induced lacuna formation in the stem causes hydraulic conductance to decline before xylem embolism inSelaginella

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 227, 期 6, 页码 1804-1817

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16649

关键词

ABA; embolism; evolution; hydraulic conductance; lycophyte; stomatal conductance; stomatal evolution

资金

  1. US Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Hatch Project) [1014908]
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [383393940]
  4. Metabolite Profiling facility of the Bindley Bioscience Center, a core facility of the National Institute of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lycophytes are the earliest diverging extant lineage of vascular plants, sister to all other vascular plants. Given that most species are adapted to ever-wet environments, it has been hypothesized that lycophytes, and by extension the common ancestor of all vascular plants, have few adaptations to drought. We investigated the responses to drought of key fitness-related traits such as stomatal regulation, shoot hydraulic conductance (K-shoot) and stem xylem embolism resistance inSelaginella haematodesandS. pulcherrima, both native to tropical understory. During drought stomata in both species were found to close before declines inK(shoot), with a 50% loss ofK(shoot)occurring at -1.7 and -2.5 MPa inS. haematodesandS. pulcherrima, respectively. Direct observational methods revealed that the xylem of both species was resistant to embolism formation, with 50% of embolized xylem area occurring at -3.0 and -4.6 MPa inS. haematodesandS. pulcherrima, respectively. X-ray microcomputed tomography images of stems revealed that the decline inK(shoot)occurred with the formation of an air-filled lacuna, disconnecting the central vascular cylinder from the cortex. We propose that embolism-resistant xylem and large capacitance, provided by collapsing inner cortical cells, is essential forSelaginellasurvival during water deficit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据