4.6 Article

Protected superconductivity at the boundaries of charge-density-wave domains

期刊

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab976e

关键词

high-T-c superconductivity; charge-density-wave; filamentary superconductivity; magnetotransport; disorder

资金

  1. FWO Programmes
  2. JC Bose National Fellowship (RCB)
  3. EU [228043]
  4. University of Rome Sapienza [RM11715C642E8370, RM11816431DBA5AF, RM11916B56802AFE]
  5. Italian MAECI [SUPERTOP-PGR04879, AR17MO7]
  6. Regione Lazio under project SIMAP
  7. Chaire Joliot at ESPCI Paris
  8. EU through the COST action [CA16218]
  9. Italian MIUR [PRIN 2017Z8TS5B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid He-4 may acquire superfluid characteristics due to the frustration of the solid phase at grain boundaries. Here, introducing a negative-U generalized Hubbard model and a coarse-grained semiclassical pseudospin model, we show that an analogous effect occurs in systems with competition among charge-density-waves (CDW) and superconductivity in the presence of disorder, as cuprate or dichalcogenide superconductors. The CDW breaks apart in domains with topologically protected filamentary superconductivity at the interfaces. Our transport measurements, carried out in underdoped La2-xSrxCuO4, with the magnetic field acting as a control parameter, are shown to be in excellent agreement with our theoretical prediction. Assuming superconductivity and CDW phases have similar energies, at intermediate temperatures, the magnetic field drives the system from a fluctuating superconductor to a CDW as expected in the clean limit. Lowering the temperature, the expected clean quantum critical point is avoided and a filamentary phase appears, analogous to 'glassy' supersolid phenomena in He-4. The transition line ends at a second quantum critical point at high-fields. Within our scenario, the filamentary superconducting phase is parasitic with CDW and bulk superconducting phases playing the role of primary competing order parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据