4.5 Review

ANTIBODIES AND RECEPTORS: From Neuromuscular Junction to Central Nervous System

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 439, 期 -, 页码 48-61

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.03.009

关键词

neuromuscular junction; neuromuscular transmission; acetylcholine receptor; muscle specific kinase; antibody; neurological disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a relatively rare neurological disease that is usually associated with antibodies to the acetylcholine receptor (AChR). These antibodies (Abs) cause loss of the AChRs from the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), resulting in muscle weakness that can be life-threatening. Another form of the disease is caused by antibodies to muscle specific kinase (MuSK) that result in impaired AChR clustering and numbers at the NMJ, and may also interfere with presynaptic adaptive mechanisms. Other autoimmune disorders, Lambert Eaton myasthenic syndrome and acquired neuromyotonia, are associated with antibodies to presynaptic voltagegated calcium and potassium channels respectively. All four conditions can be diagnosed by specific clinical features, electromyography and serum antibody tests, and can be treated effectively by a combination of pharmacological approaches and procedures that reduce the levels of the IgG antibodies. They form the first of a spectrum of diseases in which serum autoantibodies bind to extracellular domains of neuronal proteins throughout the nervous system and lead to constellations of clinical features including paralysis, sensory disturbance and pain, memory loss, seizures, psychiatric disturbance and movement disorders. This review will briefly summarize the ways in which this field has developed, since the 1970s when considerable contributions were made in Ricardo Miledi's laboratory at UCL. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Honoring Ricardo Miledi - outstanding neuroscientist of XX-XXI centuries. (C) 2020 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据