4.7 Article

A computational tool (H-MAGMA) for improved prediction of brain-disorder risk genes by incorporating brain chromatin interaction profiles

期刊

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 583-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-0603-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R00MH113823, DP2MH122403, R56MH101454, R0MH106056]
  2. NARSAD Young Investigator Award from the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
  3. SPARK grant from the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
  4. UNC Neuroscience Center [5T32NS007431]
  5. Helen Lyng White Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most risk variants for brain disorders identified by genome-wide association studies reside in the noncoding genome, which makes deciphering biological mechanisms difficult. A commonly used tool, multimarker analysis of genomic annotation (MAGMA), addresses this issue by aggregating single nucleotide polymorphism associations to nearest genes. Here we developed a platform, Hi-C-coupled MAGMA (H-MAGMA), that advances MAGMA by incorporating chromatin interaction profiles from human brain tissue across two developmental epochs and two brain cell types. By analyzing gene regulatory relationships in the disease-relevant tissue, H-MAGMA identified neurobiologically relevant target genes. We applied H-MAGMA to five psychiatric disorders and four neurodegenerative disorders to interrogate biological pathways, developmental windows and cell types implicated for each disorder. Psychiatric-disorder risk genes tended to be expressed during mid-gestation and in excitatory neurons, whereas neurodegenerative-disorder risk genes showed increasing expression over time and more diverse cell-type specificities. H-MAGMA adds to existing analytic frameworks to help identify the neurobiological principles of brain disorders. Sey et al. report a computational tool, H-MAGMA, that extracts neurobiological insights from brain-disorder GWAS by linking risk variants to their cognate genes using chromatin interaction profiles from human brain tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据