4.8 Review

From nanoscale interface characterization to sustainable energy storage using all-solid-state batteries

期刊

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 170-180

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-020-0657-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. LG Chem through the Battery Innovation Contest (BIC) program
  2. Energy & Biosciences Institute through the EBI-Shell program
  3. US Department of Energy via ReCell Center
  4. Jacob School of Engineering at University of California San Diego
  5. Zable Endowed Chair Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This Review summarizes the current nanoscale understanding of the interface chemistries between solid state electrolytes and electrodes for future all solid state batteries. The recent discovery of highly conductive solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) has led to tremendous progress in the development of all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs). Though promising, they still face barriers that limit their practical application, such as poor interfacial stability, scalability challenges and production safety. Additionally, efforts to develop sustainable manufacturing of lithium ion batteries are still lacking, with no prevailing strategy developed yet to handle recyclability of ASSBs. To date, most SSE research has been largely focused on the discovery of novel electrolytes. Recent review articles have extensively examined a broad spectrum of these SSEs using evaluation factors such as conductivity and chemical stability. Recognizing this, in this Review we seek to evaluate SSEs beyond conventional factors and offer a perspective on various bulk, interface and nanoscale phenomena that require urgent attention within the scientific community. We provide a realistic assessment of the current state-of-the-art characterization techniques and evaluate future full cell ASSB prototyping strategies. We hope to offer rational solutions to overcome some major fundamental obstacles faced by the ASSB community, as well as potential strategies toward a sustainable ASSB recycling model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据