4.8 Article

Large-scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer's disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 769-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0815-6

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01AG053960, R01AG057911, R01AG061800, RF1AG057471, RF1AG057470, R01AG057339, U01AG061357, P50AG025688, RF1AG051633, P30AG10161, R01AG15819, R01AG17917, U01AG61356, R01AG056533, K08NS099474]
  2. National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  3. [U01AG046170]
  4. [RF1AG054014]
  5. [RF1AG057440]
  6. [R01AG057907]
  7. [U01AG052411]
  8. [P30AG10124]
  9. [U01AG046161]
  10. [R01AG050631]
  11. [P50AG005146]
  12. [U24NS072026]
  13. [P30AG19610]
  14. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [ZIAAG000200] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-scale, comprehensive proteomic profiling of Alzheimer's disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals disease-associated protein coexpression modules and highlights the importance of glia and energy metabolism in disease pathogenesis. Our understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology remains incomplete. Here we used quantitative mass spectrometry and coexpression network analysis to conduct the largest proteomic study thus far on AD. A protein network module linked to sugar metabolism emerged as one of the modules most significantly associated with AD pathology and cognitive impairment. This module was enriched in AD genetic risk factors and in microglia and astrocyte protein markers associated with an anti-inflammatory state, suggesting that the biological functions it represents serve a protective role in AD. Proteins from this module were elevated in cerebrospinal fluid in early stages of the disease. In this study of >2,000 brains and nearly 400 cerebrospinal fluid samples by quantitative proteomics, we identify proteins and biological processes in AD brains that may serve as therapeutic targets and fluid biomarkers for the disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据