4.8 Article

Engineered triply orthogonal pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNA pairs enable the genetic encoding of three distinct non-canonical amino acids

期刊

NATURE CHEMISTRY
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 535-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41557-020-0472-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC [MC_UP_A024_1008, MC_U105181009] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs) can be incorporated into proteins in cells using orthogonal aminaocyl-tRNA synthetase/tRNA pairs; the most widely adopted system is based on a pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase (PylRS)/tRNA pair. Now, three new PylRS/tRNA pairs have been developed that are mutually orthogonal and can be used together to site-specifically incorporate three distinct ncAAs into a single protein. Expanding and reprogramming the genetic code of cells for the incorporation of multiple distinct non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs), and the encoded biosynthesis of non-canonical biopolymers, requires the discovery of multiple orthogonal aminoacyl-transfer RNA synthetase/tRNA pairs. These pairs must be orthogonal to both the host synthetases and tRNAs and to each other. Pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase (PylRS)/(Pyl)tRNA pairs are the most widely used system for genetic code expansion. Here, we reveal that the sequences of Delta NPylRS/(Delta NPyl)tRNA pairs (which lack N-terminal domains) form two distinct classes. We show that the measured specificities of the Delta NPylRSs and (Delta NPyl)tRNAs correlate with sequence-based clustering, and most Delta NPylRSs preferentially function with (Delta NPyl)tRNAs from their class. We then identify 18 mutually orthogonal pairs from the 88 Delta NPylRS/(Delta NPyl)tRNA combinations tested. Moreover, we generate a set of 12 triply orthogonal pairs, each composed of three new PylRS/(Pyl)tRNA pairs. Finally, we diverge the ncAA specificity and decoding properties of each pair, within a triply orthogonal set, and direct the incorporation of three distinct non-canonical amino acids into a single polypeptide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据