4.8 Article

A nucleotide-switch mechanism mediates opposing catalytic activities of Rel enzymes

期刊

NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 834-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-020-0520-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fonds National de Recherche Scientifique [FNRS-EQP U.N043.17F, FRFS-WELBIO CR-2017S-03, FNRS-PDR T.0066.18]
  2. Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance [JPI-EC-AMR-R.8004.18-]
  3. Swedish Research council [2017-03783]
  4. Ragnar Soderberg foundation fellowship
  5. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO Vlaanderen) [G0B4915N]
  6. KU Leuven Research Fund [C14/16/053]
  7. Flemish government through long-term structural funding Methusalem (CASAS2) [Meth/15/04]
  8. Fonds National de Recherche Scientifique FNRS-FRIA
  9. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders
  10. FNRS [CR/DM-392]
  11. Umeao Centre for Microbial Research (UCMR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bifunctional Rel stringent factors, the most abundant class of RelA/SpoT homologs, are ribosome-associated enzymes that transfer a pyrophosphate from ATP onto the 3 ' of guanosine tri-/diphosphate (GTP/GDP) to synthesize the bacterial alarmone (p)ppGpp, and also catalyze the 3 ' pyrophosphate hydrolysis to degrade it. The regulation of the opposing activities of Rel enzymes is a complex allosteric mechanism that remains an active research topic despite decades of research. We show that a guanine-nucleotide-switch mechanism controls catalysis by Thermus thermophilus Rel (Rel(Tt)). The binding of GDP/ATP opens the N-terminal catalytic domains (NTD) of Rel(Tt) (Rel(Tt)(NTD)) by stretching apart the two catalytic domains. This activates the synthetase domain and allosterically blocks hydrolysis. Conversely, binding of ppGpp to the hydrolase domain closes the NTD, burying the synthetase active site and precluding the binding of synthesis precursors. This allosteric mechanism is an activity switch that safeguards against futile cycles of alarmone synthesis and degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据