4.8 Article

The pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 transgenic mice

期刊

NATURE
卷 583, 期 7818, 页码 830-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2312-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research and Development Project of China [2020YFC0841100]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for CAMS of China [2020HY320001]
  3. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2016YFD0500304]
  4. CAMS initiative for Innovative Medicine of China [2016-I2M-2-006]
  5. National Mega projects of China for Major Infectious Diseases [2017ZX10304402, 2018ZX10301403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has become a public health emergency of international concern(1). Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the cell-entry receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)(2). Here we infected transgenic mice that express human ACE2 (hereafter, hACE2 mice) with SARS-CoV-2 and studied the pathogenicity of the virus. We observed weight loss as well as virus replication in the lungs of hACE2 mice infected with SARS-CoV-2. The typical histopathology was interstitial pneumonia with infiltration of considerable numbers of macrophages and lymphocytes into the alveolar interstitium, and the accumulation of macrophages in alveolar cavities. We observed viral antigens in bronchial epithelial cells, macrophages and alveolar epithelia. These phenomena were not found in wild-type mice infected with SARS-CoV-2. Notably, we have confirmed the pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 in hACE2 mice. This mouse model of SARS-CoV-2 infection will be valuable for evaluating antiviral therapeutic agents and vaccines, as well as understanding the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 causes interstitial pneumonia and viral replication in the lungs of transgenic mice that express a human version of ACE2, confirming the pathogenicity of the virus in this model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据