4.8 Article

Dopamine D2 receptors in discrimination learning and spine enlargement

期刊

NATURE
卷 579, 期 7800, 页码 555-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2115-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. CREST [JPMJCR1652]
  2. JST, SRPBS [JP19dm0107120]
  3. Brain/MINDS [19dm0207069h0001]
  4. AMED from JSPS [26221001, 19K16249, 16H06395, 16H06396, 16K21720]
  5. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI) from MEXT
  6. Takeda Science Foundation
  7. Naito Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detection of dopamine dips by neurons that express dopamine D2 receptors in the striatum is used to refine generalized reward conditioning mediated by dopamine D1 receptors. Dopamine D2 receptors (D2Rs) are densely expressed in the striatum and have been linked to neuropsychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia(1,2). High-affinity binding of dopamine suggests that D2Rs detect transient reductions in dopamine concentration (the dopamine dip) during punishment learning(3-5). However, the nature and cellular basis of D2R-dependent behaviour are unclear. Here we show that tone reward conditioning induces marked stimulus generalization in a manner that depends on dopamine D1 receptors (D1Rs) in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of mice, and that discrimination learning refines the conditioning using a dopamine dip. In NAc slices, a narrow dopamine dip (as short as 0.4 s) was detected by D2Rs to disinhibit adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)R)-mediated enlargement of dendritic spines in D2R-expressing spiny projection neurons (D2-SPNs). Plasticity-related signalling by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II and A(2A)Rs in the NAc was required for discrimination learning. By contrast, extinction learning did not involve dopamine dips or D2-SPNs. Treatment with methamphetamine, which dysregulates dopamine signalling, impaired discrimination learning and spine enlargement, and these impairments were reversed by a D2R antagonist. Our data show that D2Rs refine the generalized reward learning mediated by D1Rs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据