4.6 Article

Mortality risk of a future heat event across a subtropical city: implications for community planning and health policy

期刊

NATURAL HAZARDS
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 623-637

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04003-x

关键词

Projected mortality; Extreme heat; WRF; Urban health risk; Community planning; Policy implications

资金

  1. Seed Fund for Basic Research, The University of Hong Kong [201903159006]
  2. Research Grants Council [C7064-18GF]
  3. Research Institute for Sustainable Urban Development [1-BBWD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we applied the Weather Research and Forecasting model to project 2050 urban and rural temperature. We applied a time-stratified analysis to compare it with mortality between 2001 and 2014 and between 2011 and 2014, to estimate the elevated risk of a 2050 heat event. We included change in daytime versus nighttime and urban versus rural temperatures as factors to project mortality, to evaluate the potential influence of climate change on mortality risk. Increases of 2.9 degrees C and 2.6 degrees C in maximum and minimum air temperature are projected in a 2050 heat event, with a day and a night that will have respective temperatures 9.8 degrees C and 4.9 degrees C higher than 2001-2014. Significantly higher mortality risk is forecasted in 2050 compared to 2001-2014 (IRR 1.721 [1.650, 1.796]) and 2011-2014 (IRR 1.622 [1.547, 1.701]) without consideration of temperature change. After consideration of changing temperature, change in maximum temperature in rural areas will induce the highest mortality risk during 2050, possibly due to rapid urbanization across the city, and with the second highest mortality risk induced by the change in minimum temperature in urbanized areas, possibly because local people in the city have been adapted to the maximum level of urban thermal stress during a summer day. Improvements to heat warning systems and sustainable planning protocols are urgently needed for climate change mitigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据