4.6 Article

γδ T cells compose a developmentally regulated intrauterine population and protect against vaginal candidiasis

期刊

MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 969-981

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/s41385-020-0305-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Skodowska-Curie grant [792383]
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/P012175/1, MR/P012175/2]
  3. Wellcome Trust (WT) Investigator Award [106292/Z/14/Z]
  4. EMBO [ALTF 198-2018]
  5. NMBU
  6. FCI from Cancer Research UK [FC001093]
  7. MRC [FC001093]
  8. WT [FC001093]
  9. MRC [MR/P012175/1, MR/P012175/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [792383] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  11. Wellcome Trust [106292/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This most comprehensive analysis to date of gamma delta T cells in the murine uterus reveals them to compose a unique local T-cell compartment. Consistent with earlier reports, most cells expressed a canonical V gamma 6V delta 1 TCR, and produced interleukin (IL)-17A upon stimulation. Nonetheless, contrasting with earlier reports, uterine gamma delta T cells were not obviously intraepithelial, being more akin to sub-epithelial V gamma 6V delta 1(+) T cells at several other anatomical sites. By contrast to other tissues however, the uterine compartment also included non-V gamma 6(+), IFN-gamma-producing cells; was strikingly enriched in young mice; expressed genes hitherto associated with the uterus, including the progesterone receptor; and did not require microbes for development and/or maintenance. This notwithstanding, gamma delta T-cell deficiency severely impaired resistance to reproductive tract infection by Candida albicans, associated with decreased responses of IL-17-dependent neutrophils. These findings emphasise tissue-specific complexities of different mucosal gamma delta cell compartments, and their evident importance in lymphoid stress-surveillance against barrier infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据