4.7 Article

Mon-735: a new low-mass pre-main-sequence eclipsing binary in NGC 2264

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1016

关键词

binaries: eclipsing; binaries: spectroscopic; stars: fundamental parameters; stars: low-mass; stars: pre-main-sequence; open clusters and associations: individual: NGC 2264

资金

  1. David and Claudia Harding Foundation in the form of a Winton Exoplanet Fellowship
  2. W. M. Keck Foundation
  3. Spanish MINECO [AYA201784089]
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NNX08AR22G]
  5. National Science Foundation [AST1238877]
  6. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  7. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  8. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  9. STFC [ST/S000488/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present Mon-735, a detached double-lined eclipsing binary (EB) member of the similar to 3Myr old NGC 2264 star-forming region, detected by Spitzer. We simultaneously model the Spitzer light curves, follow-up Keck/HIRES radial velocities, and the system's spectral energy distribution to determine self-consistent masses, radii, and effective temperatures for both stars. We find that Mon-735 comprises two pre-main-sequence M dwarfs with component masses of M = 0.2918 +/- 0.0099 and 0.2661 +/- 0.0095 M-circle dot, radii of R = 0.762 +/- 0.022 and 0.748 +/- 0.023 R-circle dot, and effective temperatures of T-eff = 3260 +/- 73 and 3213 +/- 73 K. The two stars travel on circular orbits around their common centre of mass in P = 1.9751388 +/- 0.0000050 d. We compare our results for Mon-735, along with another EB in NGC 2264 (CoRoT 223992193), to the predictions of five stellar evolution models. These suggest that the lower mass EB system Mon-735 is older than CoRoT 223992193 in the mass-radius diagram (MRD) and, to a lesser extent, in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). The MRD ages of Mon-735 and CoRoT 223992193 are similar to 7-9 and 4-6 Myr, respectively, with the two components in each EB system possessing consistent ages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据