4.7 Article

An in-depth investigation of 11 pulsars discovered by FAST

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa1328

关键词

surveys; stars: neutron; pulsars: general

资金

  1. National Program on Key Research and Development Project [2017YFA0402600]
  2. CAS Strategic Priority Research Program [XDB23000000]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11690024, 11725313, 11743002, 11873067, U1731218, 11703047, 11773041, U1631132, U1831131]
  4. Australian Government
  5. Science and Technology Fund of Guizhou Province [(2016)-4008, (2017)5726-37]
  6. CAS 'Light of West China' Program
  7. CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program
  8. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present timing solutions and analyses of 11 pulsars discovered by the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST). These pulsars were discovered using an ultrawide bandwidth receiver in drift-scan observations made during the commissioning phase of FAST, and were then confirmed and timed using the 64-m Parkes Radio Telescope. Each pulsar has been observed over a span of at least one year. Highlighted discoveries include PSR J0344-0901, which displays mode-changing behaviour and may belong to the class of so-called swooshing pulsars (alongside PSRs B0919+06 and B 1859+07); PSR J0803-0942, whose emission is almost completely linearly polarized; and PSRs J1900-0134 and J1945 + 1211, whose well-defined polarization angle curves place stringent constraints on their emission geometry. We further discuss the detectability of these pulsars by earlier surveys, and highlight lessons learned from our work in carrying out confirmation and monitoring observations of pulsars discovered by a highly sensitive telescope, many of which may be applicable to next-generation pulsar surveys. This paper marks one of the first major releases of FAST-discovered pulsars, and paves the way for future discoveries anticipated from the Commensal Radio Astronomy FAST Survey.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据