4.6 Article

Self-Healing Properties of Bioinspired Amorphous CaCO3/Polyphosphate-Supplemented Cement

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25102360

关键词

polyphosphate; amorphous calcium carbonate; calcite; Portland cement; microcrack formation; self-healing; 3-point bending; nanoindentation

资金

  1. ERC [268476, 324564, 662486, 767234]
  2. EU [760858]
  3. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  4. Science and Technology Development Fund (STDF) of the Arab Republic of Egypt [01DH17034]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [324564, 767234, 662486] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a strong interest in cement additives that are able to prevent or mitigate the adverse effects of cracks in concrete that cause corrosion of the reinforcement. Inorganic polyphosphate (polyP), a natural polymer that is synthesized by bacteria, even those on cement/concrete, can increase the resistance of concrete to progressive damage from micro-cracking. Here we use a novel bioinspired strategy based on polyP-stabilized amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) to give this material self-healing properties. Portland cement was supplemented with ACC nanoparticles which were stabilized with 10% (w/w) Na-polyP. Embedding these particles in the hydrated cement resulted in the formation of calcite crystals after a hardening time of 10 days, which were not seen in controls, indicating that the particles dissolve and then transform into calcite. While there was no significant repair in the controls without ACC, almost complete closure of the cracks was observed after a 10 days healing period in the ACC-supplemented samples. Nanoindentation measurements on the self-healed crack surfaces showed a similar or slightly higher elasticity at a lower hardness compared to non-cracked surfaces. Our results demonstrate that bioinspired approaches, like the use of polyP-stabilized ACC shown here, can significantly improve the repair capacity of Portland cement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据