4.6 Article

Lapatinib, Nilotinib and Lomitapide Inhibit Haemozoin Formation in Malaria Parasites

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25071571

关键词

beta-haematin; haemozoin; virtual screening; docking; drug repurposing; Plasmodium; antimalarials; tyrosine kinase inhibitors

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01AI110329, R01AI143521]
  2. CIDRI Africa scholarship
  3. National Research Foundation of South Africa scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the continued loss of antimalarials to resistance, drug repositioning may have a role in maximising efficiency and accelerating the discovery of new antimalarial drugs. Bayesian statistics was previously used as a tool to virtually screen USFDA approved drugs for predicted beta-haematin (synthetic haemozoin) inhibition and in vitro antimalarial activity. Here, we report the experimental evaluation of nine of the highest ranked drugs, confirming the accuracy of the model by showing an overall 93% hit rate. Lapatinib, nilotinib, and lomitapide showed the best activity for inhibition of beta-haematin formation and parasite growth and were found to inhibit haemozoin formation in the parasite, providing mechanistic insights into their mode of antimalarial action. We then screened the USFDA approved drugs for binding to the beta-haematin crystal, applying a docking method in order to evaluate its performance. The docking method correctly identified imatinib, lapatinib, nilotinib, and lomitapide. Experimental evaluation of 22 of the highest ranked purchasable drugs showed a 24% hit rate. Lapatinib and nilotinib were chosen as templates for shape and electrostatic similarity screening for lead hopping using the in-stock ChemDiv compound catalogue. The actives were novel structures worthy of future investigation. This study presents a comparison of different in silico methods to identify new haemozoin-inhibiting chemotherapeutic alternatives for malaria that proved to be useful in different ways when taking into consideration their strengths and limitations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据