4.6 Article

Fractionation of Waste MDF by Steam Refining

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules25092165

关键词

biorefinery; MDF; recycling; waste valorization; steam treatment; hemicelluloses; fibers

资金

  1. PTJ, BMBF [031B0610]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In view of the expected increase in available waste medium-density fiberboard (MDF) and the current insufficient and unsatisfactory disposal capacities, efficient ways of recycling the waste material need to be developed. In this study, the potential of steam refining as a method to hydrolyze the resins, isolate fibers, and obtain a hemicellulose-rich extract available for further utilization in the context of a biorefinery was assessed. Two different MDF waste samples, as well as poplar (Populus spp.) and spruce (Picea spp.) wood chips for benchmarking, were treated over a severity range from 2.47 to 3.95. The separated fiber and extract fractions were analyzed with regard to yield, content of carbohydrates, acids, degradation products, and nitrogen. A fiber fraction of more than 70% yield and an extract containing up to 30% of carbohydrates for further processing can be gained by steam-refining waste MDF. At low severities, most of the nitrogen-based compounds are solubilized. Increasing the severity leads to a decrease in nitrogen in the extract as the nitrogen compounds are converted into volatiles. A non-hydrolysable resin residue remains on the fibers, independent of the treatment severity. In comparison to the benchmark samples, the extract fraction of waste MDF shows a high pH of 8 and high amounts of acetic and formic acid. The generation of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) on the other hand is suppressed. Distinct differences in carbohydrate hydrolysis behavior between waste MDF and conventional wood can be observed. Especially, the mannose-containing constituents seem to be resistant to hydrolysis reactions in the milieu created in MDF fractionation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据